Pineapple Pizza vs Traditional Pizza
Food & Dining
Chosen for polarisation rather than balance. Contested items are useful for detecting self-selection, because people with strong views are more willing to answer at all, which is a bias worth being able to see.
About this comparison
An open paired-comparison study on PickAFav™. Adding your preference contributes to the food & dining set.
Why the framing changes the answer
"What would you order" and "what is acceptable" separate a personal preference from a social judgement. Contested pairs are where that distinction shows up most clearly.
What segmentation reveals
A designed round could capture response latency as a signal of how the question is being processed. That is not collected here, and is the sort of instrumentation a pilot would add.
Add your preference
Voting happens in the PickAFav™ app. A free account is required, and that requirement is deliberate: it is what keeps the sample defensible.
Vote on Pineapple Pizza vs Traditional Pizza
How this data is collected
- One vote per person, per pair. Votes are bound to a registered account and cannot be repeated or changed.
- No anonymous voting. Open endpoints can be scripted, and a single motivated actor can flood a result.
- Aggregate results are not published here. Distributions are analysed as part of PickAFav™ research work.
Study design, methodology and pilots: PickAFav™ Preference Research.